Aq
Aq
For other uses, see Age of Aquarius (disambiguation).
The Age of Aquarius, in astrology, is either the current or forthcoming astrological age, depending on the method of calculation:
Astrologers maintain that an astrological age is a product of the Earth's slow precessional rotation and lasts for 2,160 years, on average (one 25,920 year period of precession, or great year, divided by 12 zodiac signs equals a 2,160 year astrological age):
An Age of Aquarius symbol: Leonardo da Vinci's Vitruvian Man. Da Vinci drew the original of this figure c. 1487. Chakras, or energy centers, were added later:
There are various methods of calculating the boundaries of an astrological age. In Sun-sign astrology, the first sign is Aries, followed by Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces, whereupon the cycle returns to Aries and through the zodiacal signs again. Astrological ages proceed in the opposite direction. Therefore, the Age of Aquarius follows the Age of Pisces:
The approximate 2,160 years for each age corresponds to the average time it takes for the vernal equinox to move from one constellation of the zodiac into the next. This average can be computed by dividing the Earth's 25,800 year gyroscopic precession period by 12, the number of zodiacal signs. This is only a rough calculation, as the length of time it takes for a complete precession is currently increasing. A more accurate set of figures is 25,772 years for a complete cycle and 2,147.5 years per astrological age, assuming a constant precession rate:
Astrologers do not agree on when the Aquarian age will start or even if it has already started:
Astrological ages are taken to be associated with the precession of the equinoxes. The slow wobble of the Earth's rotation axis on the celestial sphere is independent of the diurnal rotation of the Earth on its own axis and the annual revolution of the Earth around the Sun. Traditionally this 25,800 year-long cycle is calibrated, for the purposes of determining astrological ages, by the perceived location of the Sun in one of the 12 zodiac constellations at the vernal (Spring) equinox, which corresponds to the moment the Sun is perceived as crossing the celestial equator, marking the start of spring in the Northern Hemisphere each year. Roughly every 2,150 years the Sun's position at the time of the vernal equinox will have moved into a new zodiacal constellation:
In 1929 the International Astronomical Union defined the edges of the 88 official constellations. The edge established between Pisces and Aquarius officially locates the beginning of the Aquarian Age around 2600 CE. Many astrologers dispute this approach because of the varying sizes and overlap between the zodiacal constellations:
They prefer the long-established convention of equally-sized signs, spaced every 30 degrees along the ecliptic, which are named after what were the 12 background zodiacal constellations when tropical astrology was codified c. 100 CE.
Astrological meaning:
Astrologers believe that an astrological age affects humanity, possibly by influencing the rise and fall of civilizations or cultural tendencies:
Among other dates, one view is that the age of Aquarius arrived around 1844, with the harbinger of Siyyid ʿAlí Muḥammad (1819–1850), who founded Bábism:
Moore & Douglas (1971) promoted the view that, although no one knows when the Aquarian age begins, the American Revolution, the Industrial Revolution, and the discovery of electricity are all attributable to Aquarian influence. They make a number of predictions about the trends that they believe will develop in the Aquarian age:
Proponents of medieval astrology suggest that the Pisces world where religion is the opiate of the masses will be replaced in the Aquarian age by a world ruled by secretive, power-hungry elites seeking absolute power over others; that knowledge in the Aquarian age will only be valued for its ability to win wars; that knowledge and science will be abused, not industry and trade; and that the Aquarian age will be another dark age in which religion is considered offensive:
Another view suggests that the rise of scientific rationalism, combined with the fall of religious influence, the increasing focus on human rights since the 1780s, the exponential growth of technology, plus the advent of flight and space travel, are evidence of the dawning of the age of Aquarius:
A "wave" theory of the shifting great ages suggests that the age of Aquarius will not arrive on a given date, but is instead emerging in influence over many years, similar to how the tide rises gradually, by small increments, rather than surging forward all at once.
Rudolf Steiner believed that the age of Aquarius will arrive in 3573 CE. In Steiner's approach, each age is exactly 2,160 years. Based on this structure, the world has been in the age of Pisces since 1413. Rudolf Steiner had spoken about two great spiritual events: The return of Christ in the ethereal world (and not in a physical body), because people must develop their faculties until they can reach the ethereal world; and the incarnation of Ahriman, Zoroaster's "destructive spirit" that will try to block the development of humanity.
In a 1890 article about feminism in the French newspaper La Fronde on 26 February 1890, August Vandekerkhove stated: "About March, 21st this year the cycle of Aquarius will start. Aquarius is the house of the woman". He adds that is in this age the woman will be "equal" to the man.
Gnostic philosopher Samael Aun Weor declared 4 February 1962 to be the beginning of the "age of Aquarius", heralded by the alignment of the first six planets, the Sun, the Moon and the constellation Aquarius.
Psychoanalyst Carl Jung mentions the "age of Aquarius" in his book Aion, believing that the "age of Aquarius" will "constellate the problem of the union of the opposites".[16] In accordance with prominent astrologers, Jung believed the "age of Aquarius" will be a dark and spiritually deficient time for humanity, writing that
"it will no longer be possible to write off evil as the mere privation of good; its real existence will have to be recognized in the age of Aquarius":
According to Jung's interpretation of astrology, the "age of Pisces" began with the birth and death of Christ, associating the ichthys (colloquially known as the "Jesus fish") with the symbol of Pisces; following the "age of Pisces" would be the "age of Aquarius", the spiritually deficient age before the arrival of the rain of the Holy Cretor:
The 1967 musical Hair, with its opening song "Aquarius" which features the line "This is the dawning of the Age of Aquarius" in the chorus, brought the Aquarian age concept to the attention of audiences worldwide. The song further defines this "dawning of the age" within the first lines:
"When the moon is in the Seventh House
And Jupiter aligns with Mars
Then peace will guide the planets:
Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.
Privacy policy Contact Wikipedia Code of Conduct Developers Statistics Cookie statement Terms of Use Desktop
2 Comments
07/16/2025 7:38 pm
Skip to main content
What Is Temporary Protected Status?
Backgrounder
What Is Temporary Protected Status?
Temporary Protected Status has long been used as a humanitarian solution for migrants who are unable to return home safely. President Trump’s renewed efforts to scale back such programs have further fueled the debate over the immigration policy’s use and scope.
Activists listen to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speak about TPS outside the Capitol.
Activists listen to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speak about TPS outside the Capitol. Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images
Written By
Diana Roy and Claire Klobucista
Updated
Last updated July 9, 2025 10:10 am (EST)
Summary
Since 1990, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) has allowed migrants from countries with unsafe conditions to reside and work legally in the United States. As of June 2025, seventeen countries have TPS designations.
In his second term, President Donald Trump has attempted to roll back TPS protections for various countries—notably Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela—in addition to other humanitarian parole programs.
These efforts have been met with legal challenges. A federal judge in July blocked the administration from cutting short TPS protections for Haitians.
Introduction
Established by the U.S. Congress in 1990, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) is a program that allows migrants whose home countries are considered unsafe to live and work in the United States for a temporary, but extendable, period of time. Though they are not considered lawful permanent residents or U.S. citizens, many TPS recipients have lived in the United States for more than twenty years. Legal challenges to these moves are ongoing.
The program has broadly received bipartisan support since its creation, but has also sparked controversy. President Donald Trump sought to end TPS for hundreds of thousands of migrants as part of his efforts to restrict immigration during his first term, but his attempts were delayed by court challenges. President Joe Biden promised to overhaul Trump-era immigration policies, granting TPS status to several additional countries and extending deportation protections for others. In his second term, Trump is again targeting TPS, alongside other humanitarian parole programs. As part of this effort, he has ordered his administration to review all TPS designations and has revoked TPS status for hundreds of thousands of nationals from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and elsewhere.
Related
Central America’s Turbulent Northern Triangle
by Diana Roy and Amelia Cheatham
U.S. Temporary Foreign Worker Visa Programs
by Claire Klobucista and Diana Roy
How Does the U.S. Refugee System Work?
by Diana Roy, Claire Klobucista and James McBride
What is TPS, and why was it created?
TPS is a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) program that allows migrants from designated countries to reside legally in the United States for a period of up to eighteen months, which the U.S. government can renew indefinitely. During that period, TPS holders are eligible for employment and travel authorization and are protected from deportation. The program does not include a path to permanent residency or U.S. citizenship, but TPS recipients can apply for those designations separately.
The World This Week
CFR President Mike Froman analyzes the most important foreign policy story of the week. Plus, get the latest news and insights from the Council’s experts. Every Friday
Email
Email Address
View all newsletters >
Congress established TPS as part of the Immigration Act of 1990 to provide humanitarian relief to citizens whose countries were suffering from natural disasters, protracted unrest, or conflict. That same year, the program was offered for the first time to Salvadorans fleeing civil war. It has been broadly supported by Democrats and Republicans for more than three decades. A similar program, known as deferred enforced departure (DED), offers a temporary stay of removal for migrants facing political or civil conflict in their home countries; DED is implemented by executive order and does not have a legislative basis.
Other countries have implemented similar forms of relief. Some European states offered temporary protection to tens of thousands of refugees from the Balkans in the 1990s, and Turkey offered temporary protection to millions of migrants who fled Syria’s civil war. Meanwhile, in 2021, the Colombian government granted ten-year temporary legal status—which allowed access to employment opportunities and social services—to more than one million Venezuelan migrants fleeing political and social unrest. Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, European Union (EU) countries voted to grant temporary protection to Ukrainians arriving in EU states seeking refuge.
How does it work?
When a country receives a TPS designation, any citizen of that country already physically present in the United States is eligible to apply for the program provided they meet certain requirements set by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, a DHS agency. (Nationals of a designated country do not automatically receive TPS.) Disqualifying factors include criminal convictions in the United States and participation in terrorist activities.
The authority to grant a country TPS designation is held by the secretary of homeland security, who can extend it if they determine that conditions in the country prevent individuals from returning home safely. Reasons for TPS designation include:
ongoing armed conflict, such as a civil war;
an environmental disaster, such as an earthquake, hurricane, drought, or epidemic; and
other extraordinary and temporary conditions that render the country unsafe.
Once a country’s designation expires, individuals return to the immigration status they held prior to receiving TPS, which for most migrants means reverting to undocumented status and facing the threat of deportation to their country of origin. They can apply for work or student visas, if eligible, though those are temporary. However, those whose spouses or adult children are citizens or legal residents could be eligible to stay in the country legally.
Which countries currently have TPS?
As of June 2025, seventeen countries are designated for TPS, according to DHS.
Almost a third of all the designated countries are in Latin America. These include El Salvador, Haiti, and Venezuela, where a worsening humanitarian crisis has caused nearly eight million people to flee the country since 2014. Hundreds of thousands of Salvadorans have been allowed to stay in the United States since devastating earthquakes rocked El Salvador in 2001. Haiti was first assigned TPS after a massive earthquake destroyed much of the country in 2010, and its designation has been extended since then amid continued violence and a prolonged political crisis. Honduras and Nicaragua were given TPS after a hurricane battered the region in 1998. Countries that have previously received TPS include Angola, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kuwait, Liberia, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone.
TPS holders are spread out across the country [PDF], with the largest populations concentrated in California, Florida, New York, and Texas. On average, TPS recipients have spent more than twenty years in the United States. But for TPS recipients whose country’s designation is set to expire—especially those who were previously undocumented residents—there are few options to remain in the United States. In June 2021, the Supreme Court ruled that being granted TPS does not override a previous unlawful entry into the country, which in practice disqualifies many migrants transitioning from TPS to permanent residency.
What is the debate over the policy?
Proponents of TPS assert that it is an effective humanitarian tool for people living in the United States who are unable to safely return to their home countries. El Salvador and Honduras, for example, are both plagued by high levels of violence linked to criminal gangs. Meanwhile, civil wars and humanitarian crises rage on in South Sudan and Yemen, while Russia continues its assault on Ukraine. As such, migrant rights supporters have advocated for reforming TPS to make it easier for migrants to obtain permanent residency [PDF].
Some experts also point to the economic benefits of having a larger immigrant population, as many TPS holders are employed. In many cases, prospects for work in their home countries are grim: the World Bank put unemployment in Haiti, the poorest country in the Americas, at 15.1 percent in 2024. TPS holders’ removal could also hurt the economies of U.S. cities with many TPS beneficiaries, such as Los Angeles, Miami, New York, and Washington, DC, advocates say. A 2017 report by the Immigrant Legal Resource Center found that ending TPS for a combined three hundred thousand Haitian, Honduran, and Salvadoran migrants that year would have resulted in $967 million in turnover costs. Additionally, removing TPS holders from the United States could damage already weak economies in their home countries. Remittances—earnings that migrants send home to support their families—made up roughly 19 percent of Haiti’s gross domestic product (GDP) in 2023.
Critics, however, argue that an originally temporary designation should not become a de facto permanent program and that TPS has been improperly extended. Many who favor limiting it say that the savings and skills TPS beneficiaries have acquired while in the United States can benefit their origin countries. Some policymakers have maintained that ending TPS designations after a set period is consistent with the program’s goal of providing a temporary safe haven for individuals rather than creating a path to permanent residency.
What changes did the first Trump administration make?
Immigration restriction was central to Trump’s campaign platform, and he took numerous steps to boost immigration enforcement and reshape asylum policy, including seeking to end TPS protections for hundreds of thousands of migrants. In late 2017, his administration terminated the TPS designations for Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan. The following January, it terminated the protections for Salvadorans, and in April, it terminated TPS for Nepal and Honduras. DHS said these countries had recovered enough for migrants to safely return, and gave them between twelve and eighteen months to remain in the United States and plan for their repatriation.
However, the terminations were challenged by multiple lawsuits, many of which argued that the decisions infringed on individuals’ constitutional rights and were racially discriminatory. In one case, a California court temporarily barred the government from implementing terminations for El Salvador, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Sudan after several TPS holders claimed the terminations were racially motivated. In November 2022, the Biden administration announced that TPS holders from those countries will remain fully protected until June 2024, though some TPS-related lawsuits are still pending.
What did Biden do?
Biden sought to reverse Trump’s restrictive approach to immigration, renewing TPS protections Trump tried to end and expanding the program to several additional countries. In March 2021, the Biden administration granted TPS designations to Myanmar and Venezuela due to their ongoing humanitarian crises. That May, it announced a new eighteen-month designation for Haiti following weeks of political unrest there. Biden’s DHS also extended TPS benefits for nine other countries, including El Salvador, Nepal, and Somalia, all of which were hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic.
In March 2022, the Biden administration granted TPS eligibility to Afghanistan, as well as to Ukraine; likewise, as conditions worsened in South Sudan, DHS extended protections to South Sudanese. Then, as conflicts in Cameroon and Ethiopia grew more dire, Biden announced first-time TPS designations for an estimated thirty-eight thousand migrants from those countries in April and October 2022, respectively. In September 2023, amid growing pressure from immigration advocates to respond to the ongoing crisis in Venezuela, his administration redesignated Venezuela for TPS to protect an estimated 472,000 Venezuelans. It also granted TPS to Lebanon for the first time the following October amid worsening regional instability. Still, migrant rights advocates, including many U.S. mayors and other local government leaders, urged the administration to grant TPS to additional countries suffering from war and natural disasters, including Guatemala and Mauritania.
In its final days, the Biden administration in January 2025 extended TPS for more than nine hundred thousand immigrants from El Salvador, Sudan, Ukraine, and Venezuela, allowing them to renew their work permits and deportation protections.
How is the second Trump administration handling TPS?
Trump has promised to dismantle his predecessor’s immigration policy, once again scaling back the use of humanitarian programs and cracking down on unauthorized immigration. In a day-one executive order, Trump ordered his administration to review all TPS designations to ensure they are “appropriately limited in scope.”
In February 2025, Trump’s Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem terminated the 2023 designation of Venezuela—a decision the Supreme Court upheld, affecting the legal status of nearly 350,000 Venezuelans. Then in May, the administration terminated Afghanistan’s TPS designation, part of DHS’s efforts to return TPS “to its original temporary intent,” said Noem.
That same month, the Supreme Court upheld the administration’s decision to revoke TPS status for more than five hundred thousand nationals of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela—protections that were granted as part of a humanitarian parole program created by the Biden administration. The following month, Noem ended TPS protections for Cameroon and Nepal, saying conditions in those countries had improved and they no longer met the statutory requirements for TPS. She also announced that the administration would be terminating Haiti’s TPS status early, effective in September, claiming the country was now a “safe” place to return. Days later, a federal judge blocked the move, ruling that designation’s scheduled end date would remain unchanged. Then in July, the administration said it was also ending TPS protections for nationals of Honduras and Nicaragua—estimated to affect roughly seventy-six thousand people—both of which have had TPS designations since 1999.
Recommended Resources
WilmerHale’s Claire Bergeron examines the legal parameters of TPS and details the program’s legislative history [PDF] for the Journal on Migration and Human Security.
The American Immigration Council provides a primer on TPS.
This Backgrounder details the U.S. immigration debate over the past few decades.
These Backgrounders dive into how the U.S. asylum and refugee processes work.
This Article breaks down the U.S. immigration terms to know.
Creative Commons: Some rights reserved.
United States
Immigration and Migration
Central America
El Salvador
Haiti
Honduras
Ariel Sheinberg contributed to this report. Will Merrow helped create the graphic.
For media inquiries on this topic, please reach out to communications@cfr.org.
Introduction
More From Our Experts
How Will the EU Elections Results Change Europe?
by Liana Fix
June 10, 2024
Iran Attack Means an Even Tougher Balancing Act for the U.S. in the Middle East
by Steven A. Cook
April 14, 2024
Iran Attacks on Israel Spur Escalation Concerns
by Ray Takeyh
April 14, 2024
Top Stories on CFR
Will Southeast Asia Help Trump Build a Wall Against Chinese Exports?
by Joshua Kurlantzick and Annabel Richter
July 15, 2025
Despite Bipartisan Backing, Nuclear’s Future Is Uncertain Under Trump
by Mia Beams
July 14, 2025
What Trump Trade Policy Has Achieved Since ‘Liberation Day’
by Inu Manak, Rebecca Patterson, Zongyuan Zoe Liu, Shannon K. O'Neil, Brad W. Setser, Edward Alden, Benn Steil, Jonathan E. Hillman, Matthew P. Goodman and Will Freeman
July 7, 2025
About
Member Programs
Contact
Support
For Media
Newsletters
Membership
Careers
©2025 Council on Foreign Relations. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
08/18/2025 1:41 pm
Home
Search for Artist or Lyrics
Search
IC3PEAK
IC3PEAK – Где мой дом?
English translation
Follow IC3PEAK
on Bandsintown
Share Font Size
English
TranslationOriginal
Where Is My Home?
Click to see the original lyrics (Russian)
Don't close the door after me
You still have the key
Don't close the door after me
I'll come back some time
I'm going, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going
To war, to war, to war, to war
I'm going, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going
To war, to war, to war, to war
There the lights are burning and they're burning with fire
But my heart is where my home is
But where is my home?
There is where my home is
But where is my home?
I'll open the door, and you're not there
This house is cold without you
I'll open the door, and there's emptiness there
I'll close it forever
I'm going, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going
To war, to war, to war, to war
I'm going, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going
To war, to war, to war, to war
Where is my home?
But where is my home?
There is where my home is
But where is my home?
Raindrops fell from the sky
I'm washing away all the dirt and tears from my face
Raindrops fell from the sky
I'm washing away my sins and putting cities on fire
I'm going, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going
To war, to war, to war, to war
I'm going, I'm going, I'm going, I'm going
To war, to war, to war, to war
Thanks!
❤
thanked 40 times
You can thank submitter by pressing this button
ShareShare
Submitted by cheväxjö123cheväxjö123 on 2025-01-30
Follow IC3PEAK
on Bandsintown
Add new translationRequest a translation
Home
I
IC3PEAK
Где мой дом?
English
Translations of "Где мой дом? (Gde ..."
English
Burmese
Chinese
Dutch
Estonian
Finnish
German
Hungarian
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Lithuanian
Polish
Serbian
Spanish
Transliteration
Turkish
Comments
Login or register to post comments
Russia is waging a disgraceful war on Ukraine. Stand With Ukraine!
How you can support Ukraine 🇺🇦 ❤️
About translator
cheväxjö123
cheväxjö123
cheväxjö123
Name: jackson
Role: Expert
Contributions:
186 translations
72 transliterations
66 songs
3159 thanks received
20 translation requests fulfilled for 17 members
left 87 comments
added 7 artists
Languages:
native: Turkish
fluent
English
Hebrew
advanced
Greek
Greek (Ancient)
Norwegian
Russian
intermediate
Arabic
Danish
Dutch
French
German
Latin
Portuguese
Spanish
Swedish
beginner
Armenian
Chinese
Finnish
Icelandic
Polish
Georgian
Ukrainian
Aramaic (Modern Syriac Dialects)
LyricsTranslate.com – the world's largest repository of lyrics translations
Join