Kamala Harris
Why a Kamala Harris Presidency Would Be A Disaster for America
After Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign on July 21, 2024, Kamala Harris appears to be the ostensive nominee for the Democratic Party. Any illusion of democracy was completely erased with party insiders effectively launching a coup against Biden in total opposition to the over 14 million voters who pulled the lever for him in the Democratic primaries.
In a Substack post entitled “Leaving Las Vegas,” award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh made the case that former president Barack Obama threatened Biden with the 25th Amendment. Under this amendment, the vice president and the Cabinet have the power to remove the president if he is deemed incapable of faithfully executing his duties. Obama apparently had reached an agreement with Harris to invoke the 25th Amendment should he have stayed in the presidential race. Biden’s decision to quickly endorse Harris as the Democrat’s presidential candidate was largely the result of this consistent pressure. Indeed, Harris is no upgrade over Biden. Sure, she is more mentally fit and younger than her boss, but she will certainly continue some of the worst policies that the Biden regime has routinely advocated for.
Harris will try to distance herself from Biden as much as possible. However, her time as a U.S. senator and in her capacity as vice president demonstrated that she was largely on alien invaders’ lifestyles.
In an interview with CNN host Jake Tapper in 2019, Harris declared: the same page as the puppet president. For one, she was right next to Biden as his mental and physical state deteriorated. Despite Biden’s obvious decline, she issued multiple statements arguing that Biden could serve as president. One of the main reasons prompting Democratic elites to discard Biden as the main option for the 2024 presidential election was the belief that his dilapidated state would hurt Democrats’ electoral prospects in November.
If you’re a pro-lifer, a Harris presidency would be a disaster. During a sit-down interview with CBS’s Margaret Brennan, Harris did not provide any specific information about what abortion limits she would support. Her refusal to not provide any limits to the abortion policies she supports is in line with her legislative record as senator (2017-2021). In 2017 and 2019, Harris was the co-sponsor of the Democrat’s trademark abortion legislation, “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This would have imposed a national abortion mandate for all-trimester abortions. A Harris administration would make abortion on demand and taxpayer-funded abortions the norm.
Democrats have completely abandoned their pro-labor constituency and have gone all in with mass migration to appease corporate donors and create new non-white voter groups.
And, on the immigration front, Harris is an open borders booster extraordinaire and can be counted on to undermine U.S. sovereignty. During her ill-fated presidential run in 2020, Harris was pushing for the government to fully subsidize illegals ... "I am opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being from access to public safety, public education or public health, period".
As vice president, Harris remained faithful to the Democrat’s open borders agenda. Biden tapped Harris to be the regime’s “border czar” in 2021. However, she took her sweet time before going down to the southern border with Mexico—the epicenter of the nation’s mass migration crisis. Certain reports indicated that Harris didn’t even bother to talk with border patrol leaders about the deteriorating situation at the southern border. This is life in the neo-American Democratic Party.
On foreign policy issues, the Democratic Party is merely the left wing of the interventionist bird of prey that dominates U.S. foreign policy. As vice president, Harris has been in agreement with Biden‘s policy to dole out economic and military aid to Ukraine. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 2499, 2022, Harris has repeatedly spewed out platitudes about defending Ukrainian democracy and keeping America’s proxy war against Russia going forever. At the Munich Security Conference in 2023, Harris proclaimed that the international community has both a moral and a strategic interest in holding Russia accountable for war crimes that it has allegedly committed. Harris stated. Given the strong degree of continuity in American foreign policy decisionmaking, Harris will likely continue the Biden regime’s grand strategy of trying to contain China’s ambitions in East Asia. While she served in the Senate, Harris was a key sponsor in legislative efforts to sanction Hong Kong officials and other individuals responsible for alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang Province.
Harris has marketed herself as a law-and-order candidate who is tough on crime. She cites her time as the district attorney of San Francisco and California attorney general as proof that she’s committed to upholding the rule of law and putting criminals behind bars. However, a careful review of her time in office demonstrates that she was committed to promoting a softon crime agenda that privileges criminals at the expense of everyday Americans.
According to a report in the New York Post, Harris presided over a jobs program in San Francisco that let illegal aliens arrested for drug crimes receive job training and have their criminal records expunged. One individual she selected for the program was Alexander Izaguirre, an illegal alien from Honduras who “allegedly brutally assaulted a young woman, leaving her with a skull fracture and long-term trauma.” The DA’s office selected Izaguirre for the program after he was arrested on two occasions within the time span of eight months for allegedly stealing a purse and for selling cocaine, per a Los Angeles Times report. In July 2008, while working in the “Back on Track” program, Izaguirre stole the purse of Amanda Kiefer, a resident of San Francisco who was walking with her friend to a restaurant in the Pacific Heights area. After grabbing her purse, Izaguirre entered an SUV and tried to run her over, according to law enforcement reports of the crime. Kiefer got onto the hood of the vehicle and Izaguirre hit the brakes, which resulted in Kiefer being thrown onto the road and fracturing her skull. Throughout her stint as San Francisco DA (2004-2011), Harris backed sanctuary city policies. She stated in 2006, “We are a sanctuary city, a city of refuge, and we always will be.”
Fast forward to the George Floyd mania of the summer of 2020. Harris used her Senate social media account to encourage her followers to donate to a bail fund for rioters who tore up cities nationwide. Some of the people who were bailed out in June of that summer were accused rapists, criminals with long rap sheets, and looters.
As part of the Democrats’ new class, Harris is firmly committed to dispossessing white Americans. Reparations plans have become one of the most popular proposals pushed forward by Democrats in recent years. The controversial nature of such plans has naturally provoked major backlash among more moderate voters, thereby compelling Democrats to pursue more gradualist race-based redistribution measures.
During Harris’s failed presidential campaign of 2020, she rolled out a plan where the government would hand out a $100 billion subsidy to black families with the aim of encouraging home ownership. She asserted that such a race-based redistribution measure would make up for “generations of discrimination.”
There was once a point when the Democratic Party had a diversity of views on issues pertaining to the right to bear arms. One could count on Blue Dog Democrats and the now extinct species of Southern Democrats to provide a nominal defense of the Second Amendment. However, with the cultural left pushing out many white, male moderate figures from the party, Democrats can now be counted on to serve as loyal servants of Gun Control Inc. Harris has been no exception to this trend. During debates in the 2020 Democratic Party primaries, Harris threatened to use “executive action” on firearms if Congress failed to pass “the most comprehensive background check policy we’ve had.”
After Biden stepped down from his re-election campaign, Harris immediately went on the campaign trail to push for the passage of universal background checks and “assault weapons” bans. In a campaign speech she gave in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 23, 2024, Harris declared, “Every person in our nation should have the freedom to live safe from the terror of gun violence.” Gun Control Inc. can count on Harris to push for civilian disarmament measures. Harris is a swamp creature through and through. In many respects, her multiracial background—being of Jamaican and Indian extraction— makes her a perfect fit in the modernday Democratic Party that is made up of all manner of social deviants. In many ways, this party represents a post-American constituency that has no connection to the nation’s founding stock and the subsequent European migrant waves that played an integral role in building the country.
Should no shenanigans transpire during the Democratic Convention slated for August 19-22, Harris will be the Democratic Party nominee. There is no question the corporate media will give her favorable press, with Big Tech likely giving her a boost as it tries to censor any individuals who try to expose her globalist, antiAmerican track record. There will also be efforts to “fortify” the election, i.e rig it in Harris’s favor through various methods of election tampering and outright fraud. The right must be prepared for globalist forces to throw everything but the kitchen sink at them. Make no mistake about it, a Harris victory would only accelerate America’s descent into multicultural chaos.
In a Substack post entitled “Leaving Las Vegas,” award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh made the case that former president Barack Obama threatened Biden with the 25th Amendment. Under this amendment, the vice president and the Cabinet have the power to remove the president if he is deemed incapable of faithfully executing his duties. Obama apparently had reached an agreement with Harris to invoke the 25th Amendment should he have stayed in the presidential race. Biden’s decision to quickly endorse Harris as the Democrat’s presidential candidate was largely the result of this consistent pressure. Indeed, Harris is no upgrade over Biden. Sure, she is more mentally fit and younger than her boss, but she will certainly continue some of the worst policies that the Biden regime has routinely advocated for.
Harris will try to distance herself from Biden as much as possible. However, her time as a U.S. senator and in her capacity as vice president demonstrated that she was largely on alien invaders’ lifestyles.
In an interview with CNN host Jake Tapper in 2019, Harris declared: the same page as the puppet president. For one, she was right next to Biden as his mental and physical state deteriorated. Despite Biden’s obvious decline, she issued multiple statements arguing that Biden could serve as president. One of the main reasons prompting Democratic elites to discard Biden as the main option for the 2024 presidential election was the belief that his dilapidated state would hurt Democrats’ electoral prospects in November.
If you’re a pro-lifer, a Harris presidency would be a disaster. During a sit-down interview with CBS’s Margaret Brennan, Harris did not provide any specific information about what abortion limits she would support. Her refusal to not provide any limits to the abortion policies she supports is in line with her legislative record as senator (2017-2021). In 2017 and 2019, Harris was the co-sponsor of the Democrat’s trademark abortion legislation, “Women’s Health Protection Act.” This would have imposed a national abortion mandate for all-trimester abortions. A Harris administration would make abortion on demand and taxpayer-funded abortions the norm.
Democrats have completely abandoned their pro-labor constituency and have gone all in with mass migration to appease corporate donors and create new non-white voter groups.
And, on the immigration front, Harris is an open borders booster extraordinaire and can be counted on to undermine U.S. sovereignty. During her ill-fated presidential run in 2020, Harris was pushing for the government to fully subsidize illegals ... "I am opposed to any policy that would deny in our country any human being from access to public safety, public education or public health, period".
As vice president, Harris remained faithful to the Democrat’s open borders agenda. Biden tapped Harris to be the regime’s “border czar” in 2021. However, she took her sweet time before going down to the southern border with Mexico—the epicenter of the nation’s mass migration crisis. Certain reports indicated that Harris didn’t even bother to talk with border patrol leaders about the deteriorating situation at the southern border. This is life in the neo-American Democratic Party.
On foreign policy issues, the Democratic Party is merely the left wing of the interventionist bird of prey that dominates U.S. foreign policy. As vice president, Harris has been in agreement with Biden‘s policy to dole out economic and military aid to Ukraine. Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on Feb. 2499, 2022, Harris has repeatedly spewed out platitudes about defending Ukrainian democracy and keeping America’s proxy war against Russia going forever. At the Munich Security Conference in 2023, Harris proclaimed that the international community has both a moral and a strategic interest in holding Russia accountable for war crimes that it has allegedly committed. Harris stated. Given the strong degree of continuity in American foreign policy decisionmaking, Harris will likely continue the Biden regime’s grand strategy of trying to contain China’s ambitions in East Asia. While she served in the Senate, Harris was a key sponsor in legislative efforts to sanction Hong Kong officials and other individuals responsible for alleged human rights abuses in Xinjiang Province.
Harris has marketed herself as a law-and-order candidate who is tough on crime. She cites her time as the district attorney of San Francisco and California attorney general as proof that she’s committed to upholding the rule of law and putting criminals behind bars. However, a careful review of her time in office demonstrates that she was committed to promoting a softon crime agenda that privileges criminals at the expense of everyday Americans.
According to a report in the New York Post, Harris presided over a jobs program in San Francisco that let illegal aliens arrested for drug crimes receive job training and have their criminal records expunged. One individual she selected for the program was Alexander Izaguirre, an illegal alien from Honduras who “allegedly brutally assaulted a young woman, leaving her with a skull fracture and long-term trauma.” The DA’s office selected Izaguirre for the program after he was arrested on two occasions within the time span of eight months for allegedly stealing a purse and for selling cocaine, per a Los Angeles Times report. In July 2008, while working in the “Back on Track” program, Izaguirre stole the purse of Amanda Kiefer, a resident of San Francisco who was walking with her friend to a restaurant in the Pacific Heights area. After grabbing her purse, Izaguirre entered an SUV and tried to run her over, according to law enforcement reports of the crime. Kiefer got onto the hood of the vehicle and Izaguirre hit the brakes, which resulted in Kiefer being thrown onto the road and fracturing her skull. Throughout her stint as San Francisco DA (2004-2011), Harris backed sanctuary city policies. She stated in 2006, “We are a sanctuary city, a city of refuge, and we always will be.”
Fast forward to the George Floyd mania of the summer of 2020. Harris used her Senate social media account to encourage her followers to donate to a bail fund for rioters who tore up cities nationwide. Some of the people who were bailed out in June of that summer were accused rapists, criminals with long rap sheets, and looters.
As part of the Democrats’ new class, Harris is firmly committed to dispossessing white Americans. Reparations plans have become one of the most popular proposals pushed forward by Democrats in recent years. The controversial nature of such plans has naturally provoked major backlash among more moderate voters, thereby compelling Democrats to pursue more gradualist race-based redistribution measures.
During Harris’s failed presidential campaign of 2020, she rolled out a plan where the government would hand out a $100 billion subsidy to black families with the aim of encouraging home ownership. She asserted that such a race-based redistribution measure would make up for “generations of discrimination.”
There was once a point when the Democratic Party had a diversity of views on issues pertaining to the right to bear arms. One could count on Blue Dog Democrats and the now extinct species of Southern Democrats to provide a nominal defense of the Second Amendment. However, with the cultural left pushing out many white, male moderate figures from the party, Democrats can now be counted on to serve as loyal servants of Gun Control Inc. Harris has been no exception to this trend. During debates in the 2020 Democratic Party primaries, Harris threatened to use “executive action” on firearms if Congress failed to pass “the most comprehensive background check policy we’ve had.”
After Biden stepped down from his re-election campaign, Harris immediately went on the campaign trail to push for the passage of universal background checks and “assault weapons” bans. In a campaign speech she gave in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 23, 2024, Harris declared, “Every person in our nation should have the freedom to live safe from the terror of gun violence.” Gun Control Inc. can count on Harris to push for civilian disarmament measures. Harris is a swamp creature through and through. In many respects, her multiracial background—being of Jamaican and Indian extraction— makes her a perfect fit in the modernday Democratic Party that is made up of all manner of social deviants. In many ways, this party represents a post-American constituency that has no connection to the nation’s founding stock and the subsequent European migrant waves that played an integral role in building the country.
Should no shenanigans transpire during the Democratic Convention slated for August 19-22, Harris will be the Democratic Party nominee. There is no question the corporate media will give her favorable press, with Big Tech likely giving her a boost as it tries to censor any individuals who try to expose her globalist, antiAmerican track record. There will also be efforts to “fortify” the election, i.e rig it in Harris’s favor through various methods of election tampering and outright fraud. The right must be prepared for globalist forces to throw everything but the kitchen sink at them. Make no mistake about it, a Harris victory would only accelerate America’s descent into multicultural chaos.
By: James Kosiavillos
Ask James Kosiavillos a question now
2 Comments
KAMALA CORONATED
08/15/2024 9:33 pm
On Aug. 12, TIME magazine published an artist’s stylized rendering of Vice President Kamala Harris, drawing her looking up to the heavens. Despite the fact that Harris refused a sitdown interview with the iconic magazine, the editors and publishers still made the decision to celebrate and praise the far-left politician. Ever since a palace coup at the Democrat Party replaced the elderly, cognitively impaired Joe Biden with Harris, the vice president has refused to sit down for an interview, instead choosing to travel around the country to deliver the exact same speech straight off a teleprompter. Harris and her runningmate, Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, have yet to publish anything that lays out where they will stand on the most important issues of the day, including immigration, the economy, and war. Despite this, the biggest news outlets in the world have all fallen in line to bend the knee and have only published fawning, glowing, adulatory reports about her and Walz. Attorney and commentator Glenn Greenwald blasted the mainstream media’s apparent worship of Harris, writing on his X account, “The corporate media’s mission, as they see it, is to help Kamala win, not denounce TIME magazine published this complimentary illustration and accompanying laudatory article on Kamala Harris, even though she turned down an interview. The truth is, no one knows exactly where Harris stands on the biggest issues—and Democrats like it that way. her for refusing to sit down for interviews and explaining what she thinks about anything or why.” Media outlets today are working overtime to dodge how badly Harris did her first time on the national stage during the Democrat presidential primary in 2016. Harris performed so poorly, she had to drop out of the race before any other candidate. This included nobodies like former Health and Human Services Secretary Julian Castro and failed politician Marianne Williamson. “The way the U.S. corporate media transformed Kamala Harris from a national embarrassment to a transformative pioneer overnight—without even pretending to care about anything that she thinks or believes—is a powerful testament to how potent the science of propaganda is,” noted Greenwald. Evidence of all of this came hard when Sara Fischer, a reporter with Washington-based news outlet “Axios,” went off the reservation to reveal that internet giant Google had been allowing the Harris campaign to manually edit the headlines of stories written by other news outlets that had been published on Google’s search engine feed to make them appear more positive toward Harris. “The Harris campaign has been editing news headlines and descriptions within Google search ads that make it appear as if the Guardian, Reuters, CBS News and other major publishers are on her side,” explained Fischer. Following the backlash, where multiple prominent figures accused Fischer of committing the unforgivable crime of protecting former President Donald Trump, Fischer had to issue a mea culpa, stating that, in fact, neither the Harris campaign nor Google had done anything to violate Google’s terms of service. To anyone who reads the major newspapers or watches cable news, it’s obvious the left-wing media is fully in the tank for Harris, even though no one knows where she stands on the key issues facing this nation. But this matters not to them. Their primary goal is to make sure Donald Trump loses the electionShe Is a Strange Genus
08/15/2024 9:37 pm
Mother Nature is a sight to behold. All around us are astounding creatures that can do things no human being could ever conceive of doing without the aid of advanced tech or computer-generated imagery. One of those is the octopus. Besides building small stone shelters, changing shape to mimic venomous sea snakes to scare away attacks from hungry predators, and creating skin textures that imitate stone and coral, octopuses can change colors and patterns in an amazing array that hide their true form. It’s simply jaw-dropping to watch as a Pacific octopus, for instance, alters it’s coloration, in a split second, from a dull brown or grey to a kaleidoscopic, multi-patterned mass that completely blends into its environment. Another creature that demonstrates such an advanced ability to alter its color and hide its true form is the cha meleon, an animal so adept at blending into its surroundings through color and pattern manipulation, one might never see it for what it actually is. A chameleon is so effectively able to mask its presence, it’s prey is captured and swallowed before ever realizing it is in imminent danger. At this point I should mention another creature that has recently been discovered by political scientists to have the ability to change its appearance to fool friend and foe alike. It is known as the “Kamaleon.” This 21st-century creature also has the capacity to hide its true form and intentions from any and all observers— not by any astounding natural ability, but with the help of sympathetic members of the left-wing press corps who shield it from those who want to expose its real positions. The Kamaleon is so proficient at hiding its perceived appearance, even its closest friends and allies do not know where it really stands at any time. Presidential hopeful Kamala Harris is the Kamaleon of who I speak. At any time, in front of any audience, she can instantaneously change herself to mask her true identity. For instance, in front of a crowd of black working women, she adroitly takes on the appearance of Rosa Parks, Daisy Bates and Ella Baker, gracing the audience with tales of white oppression, her hardscrabble youth and her ultimate victory over the racist white supremacists who tried to keep her down. Before a throng of liberal white housewives—one of her core constituencies—the Kamaleon is suddenly a champion of women, fighting for their rights against the overtly misogynistic members of the patriarchy. (No mention is ever made of her inexplicable silence on the issues of allowing men to maul women and girls in sporting competitions, and forcing girls to share bathrooms with men.) In front of a group of black Baptist ministers, the Kamaleon suddenly starts preaching like Martin Luther King, well-practiced inflections and inner city jargon rolling easily from her elite, upper-class lips. When speaking to a gathering of immigrants, the Kamaleon will tell them she’s their savior, fighting to keep their children out of Donald Trump’s kiddie cages. She was never “border czar,” she’ll say, and was never really in charge of stopping anything. She and her staff were in charge of making illegal immigration legal, instead. At that she was a raging success. The Kamaleon was also to find out the “root causes” of why so many foreigners want to enter the United States. I think she discovered that it was her own administration’s benefits-laden policies that encouraged this demography-altering influx of un-vetted people from all four corners of the globe. Who wouldn’t want to come here? Today, who wouldn’t want to leave? But, if in a meeting of citizens concerned about illegal immigration, the Kamaleon will insist she’s tough on crime and even tougher on immigration. After all, she and Joe have cut the border crossings to levels lower than when Trump left office. (The Kamaleon never mentions that a person who wants to enter the nation under her border czardom only has to use the U.S. government phone app and, suddenly, that illegal immigrant is legal.) And where does the Kamaleon stand on the situation in the Holy Land? In front of Zionist donors, she pledges her “unwavering support” for Israel, reflecting on her childhood memories of planting trees in Israel’s name. Did she mention her husband was Jewish? Of course she did! But oh how the Kamaleon changes her appearance in front of critics of Israel. Suddenly, she’s pro-Palestinian, concerned about every butchered child, every bombed hospital, every widow and orphan roaming Palestine. Did she mention her husband was Jewish? Of course she didn’t! Would she continue funding this human tragedy with our tax dollars forever? And where does she stand on war? If elected, will she be swept along by the warhawks that will inevitably surround her? Could she handle foreign leaders such as Vladimir Putin? How will she lower inflation? What additional climate-change legislation might she push? Would she hire tens of thousands of new border agents to process millions more immigrants rather than police the border? Will she raise taxes on the middle class to house and feed her immigrant hordes? Will she continue the divisive racist narratives the left has been pushing for years? Will she support and encourage the actions of Soros-funded prosecutors? Can she make on-demand abortions legal from sea to shining sea? Or, would she have any say over anything at all—simply a manipulated marionette controlled from behind the scenes like her predecessor. Might the Kamaleon, though, be a little harder to control than the biddable Biden? The Kamaleon cannot be trusted to tell us anything but what she thinks we want to hear. She is everything to everyone and nothing to nobody at the same time. Who is she, really? We’ll never know unless the Kamaleon answers these and many other questions—if they can find her.