Murder of a Civilization
Criminalizing the Recognition of Reality
Recently, I found out about “Shieldmaiden” Eva Vlaar dingerbroek, a young female Dutch lawyer who has undertaken the task of encouraging white Europeans to take a stand against the replacement of the native populations of countries consisting of ethnic nationalities such as Germans, French, Italians, Dutch, Spanish, English, Hungarians, with “Towers of Babels.”
In our world today, as in George Orwell’s novel 1984, words are turned upside down and have the opposite of their meaning. Diversity now means “sameness” with no country’s population corresponding to the ethnicity of its name. Destroying the diversity afforded by white ethnic nations is the goal of the European Union tyrants and Joe Biden who recently stated, as Tucker Carlson reported, that getting rid of white America was a good thing.
I predicted that the young white woman’s own Dutch government would close her down in some way for “racist” agitation for the continuing existence of an ethnically Dutch nation. It is okay for the Dutch to defend themselves against Russia but not against immigrant-invaders. It is certain to happen as the Dutch government has already moved against another young blond female Dutch lawyer Raisa Blommestijn. ders policy of many European nations, and anything that reflects poorly on open borders is racist. In other words, we must deny reality or be prosecuted.
Criminalizing the recognition of reality is being achieved throughout Europe and the United Kingdom. A member of the German parliament, Marie-Therese Kaiser, was convicted and fined by a German court for asking a question prompted by the governments own statistics that show that Afghan and African immigrant-invaders in Germany commit 40 and 70 times more gang rapes than ethnic Germans. The utterly moronic judge proclaimed: “Freedom of expression ends where human dignity begins.” In other words, the German judge reasons that it is the dignity of the immigrant-invader rapists that matters, not that of the raped ethnic European women. The German government, which most certainly does not represent ethnic Germans, is countering Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Raisa Blommestijn, and Marie-Therese Kaiser with a plan to “protect democracy” by seizing the bank assets of German citizens who donate money in support of politicians who think Europe is for ethnic Europeans.
RAISA BLOMMESTIJN Punished for speaking truth. from recognition in any way possible. “Information disorder” is caused by truth-tellers, so the solution to the problem is to suppress them. Famed chess master Garry Kasparov, the noted and celebrated Soviet dissident, who abhors Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, resigned from the Aspen Institute’s “Commission on Information Disorder” because it reminded him of the Soviet Union’s efforts to mind control the Soviet population, 19 and the rest of the elite organizations are a thousand-fold worst enemy of the American people than Russia, China, and Iran combined.
Perhaps this is dawning on the insouciant American population, a population long protected from reality by myths of its pureness and goodness and the home of the free. Military families themselves have turned on the anti-white U.S. military and discourage their sons from signing up. Consequently, the services cannot meet their recruitment goals. After all, what white person would be motivated to serve the Biden regime’s anti-white view of America? As white American citizens begin to comprehend that they are regarded as America’s enemy, U.S. politicians are advocating signing up the immigrant-invaders who have violated our borders into the military. In America, as in Rome—where Roman reliance on Germans as troops resulted in German rule—America will be ruled by immigrant-invaders. It is only a matter of time. As an historical entity, the United States of America is far past her prime.
With the Democrats’ open border policy and Democrat agitation for giving the vote to immigrant-invaders, it is difficult to say whether even the concept of the U.S. as a nation any longer exists. How is a land without borders a country? Blommestijn is being prosecuted for “racism” and “inciting hatred” for commenting on a video posted on social media showing a gang of immigrant-invaders brutally beating a young white boy: “How many defenseless white people remain to become victims? Countless probably: The open borders elite is importing these people in droves, with all the consequences that entails.” Blommestijn complains that Dutch citizens are being “persecuted for their political opinions,” but what is actually happening is worse.
Blommestijn is being prosecuted for calling public attention to a fact. She was supposed to ignore the fact, because the fact reflects poorly on the open-borSo, what we have is anti-white, brainwashed, indoctrinated European governments organizing the replacement of European ethnicities in their own ethnic countries and the transformation of the countries into Towers of Babel. In the United States, the destruction of white people is proceeding along a slightly different line. Over the decades, the American ruling elites, which excludes “the people,” have solidified their control by establishing groups of intellectuals, media, celebrities, and government officials in organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Aspen Institute, the World Economic Forum, and there are many others, that have laid down the “correct” line, departure from which is minimal if a person intends to remain in the “formulation of public opinion.” Dissenters from official narratives are simply excluded Internal memos of the Aspen Institute say they must keep Kasparov’s resignation secret, otherwise it could hurt the credibility of the Aspen Institute’s ability to indoctrinate the American people.
Think about the members of the Aspen Institute. They are rich and mindless. They consider themselves important and are proud of their recognition as such by being members of the Aspen Institute. They welcome the high-level approval associated with contributing to the official agendas. They are convinced that “white supremacy” in America can only be overcome by reducing the white population to a closely regulated in thought and deed minority. In other words, the Aspen Institute How is it that a country such as the United States, whose president, legislature, and judiciary refuse to protect America’s borders, has a government that lacks commitment to its own survival, but—although totally uncommitted to the survival of its own country—is committed to the survival of Ukraine and Israel? Clearly, throughout the Western world, democracy is a total failure. It is impossible for “representative government” to represent the ethnic citizens of the countries. In effect, the Western peoples are being erased, not only their voice, but their physical presence on Earth. ★ ——
In our world today, as in George Orwell’s novel 1984, words are turned upside down and have the opposite of their meaning. Diversity now means “sameness” with no country’s population corresponding to the ethnicity of its name. Destroying the diversity afforded by white ethnic nations is the goal of the European Union tyrants and Joe Biden who recently stated, as Tucker Carlson reported, that getting rid of white America was a good thing.
I predicted that the young white woman’s own Dutch government would close her down in some way for “racist” agitation for the continuing existence of an ethnically Dutch nation. It is okay for the Dutch to defend themselves against Russia but not against immigrant-invaders. It is certain to happen as the Dutch government has already moved against another young blond female Dutch lawyer Raisa Blommestijn. ders policy of many European nations, and anything that reflects poorly on open borders is racist. In other words, we must deny reality or be prosecuted.
Criminalizing the recognition of reality is being achieved throughout Europe and the United Kingdom. A member of the German parliament, Marie-Therese Kaiser, was convicted and fined by a German court for asking a question prompted by the governments own statistics that show that Afghan and African immigrant-invaders in Germany commit 40 and 70 times more gang rapes than ethnic Germans. The utterly moronic judge proclaimed: “Freedom of expression ends where human dignity begins.” In other words, the German judge reasons that it is the dignity of the immigrant-invader rapists that matters, not that of the raped ethnic European women. The German government, which most certainly does not represent ethnic Germans, is countering Eva Vlaardingerbroek, Raisa Blommestijn, and Marie-Therese Kaiser with a plan to “protect democracy” by seizing the bank assets of German citizens who donate money in support of politicians who think Europe is for ethnic Europeans.
RAISA BLOMMESTIJN Punished for speaking truth. from recognition in any way possible. “Information disorder” is caused by truth-tellers, so the solution to the problem is to suppress them. Famed chess master Garry Kasparov, the noted and celebrated Soviet dissident, who abhors Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, resigned from the Aspen Institute’s “Commission on Information Disorder” because it reminded him of the Soviet Union’s efforts to mind control the Soviet population, 19 and the rest of the elite organizations are a thousand-fold worst enemy of the American people than Russia, China, and Iran combined.
Perhaps this is dawning on the insouciant American population, a population long protected from reality by myths of its pureness and goodness and the home of the free. Military families themselves have turned on the anti-white U.S. military and discourage their sons from signing up. Consequently, the services cannot meet their recruitment goals. After all, what white person would be motivated to serve the Biden regime’s anti-white view of America? As white American citizens begin to comprehend that they are regarded as America’s enemy, U.S. politicians are advocating signing up the immigrant-invaders who have violated our borders into the military. In America, as in Rome—where Roman reliance on Germans as troops resulted in German rule—America will be ruled by immigrant-invaders. It is only a matter of time. As an historical entity, the United States of America is far past her prime.
With the Democrats’ open border policy and Democrat agitation for giving the vote to immigrant-invaders, it is difficult to say whether even the concept of the U.S. as a nation any longer exists. How is a land without borders a country? Blommestijn is being prosecuted for “racism” and “inciting hatred” for commenting on a video posted on social media showing a gang of immigrant-invaders brutally beating a young white boy: “How many defenseless white people remain to become victims? Countless probably: The open borders elite is importing these people in droves, with all the consequences that entails.” Blommestijn complains that Dutch citizens are being “persecuted for their political opinions,” but what is actually happening is worse.
Blommestijn is being prosecuted for calling public attention to a fact. She was supposed to ignore the fact, because the fact reflects poorly on the open-borSo, what we have is anti-white, brainwashed, indoctrinated European governments organizing the replacement of European ethnicities in their own ethnic countries and the transformation of the countries into Towers of Babel. In the United States, the destruction of white people is proceeding along a slightly different line. Over the decades, the American ruling elites, which excludes “the people,” have solidified their control by establishing groups of intellectuals, media, celebrities, and government officials in organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, the Aspen Institute, the World Economic Forum, and there are many others, that have laid down the “correct” line, departure from which is minimal if a person intends to remain in the “formulation of public opinion.” Dissenters from official narratives are simply excluded Internal memos of the Aspen Institute say they must keep Kasparov’s resignation secret, otherwise it could hurt the credibility of the Aspen Institute’s ability to indoctrinate the American people.
Think about the members of the Aspen Institute. They are rich and mindless. They consider themselves important and are proud of their recognition as such by being members of the Aspen Institute. They welcome the high-level approval associated with contributing to the official agendas. They are convinced that “white supremacy” in America can only be overcome by reducing the white population to a closely regulated in thought and deed minority. In other words, the Aspen Institute How is it that a country such as the United States, whose president, legislature, and judiciary refuse to protect America’s borders, has a government that lacks commitment to its own survival, but—although totally uncommitted to the survival of its own country—is committed to the survival of Ukraine and Israel? Clearly, throughout the Western world, democracy is a total failure. It is impossible for “representative government” to represent the ethnic citizens of the countries. In effect, the Western peoples are being erased, not only their voice, but their physical presence on Earth. ★ ——
By: Candy Clark
Ask Candy Clark a question now
2 Comments
05/29/2025 3:36 pm
According to the South African government, the chief motive for attacks on white owned farms is robbery.
A Committee of Inquiry into Farm Attacks was appointed in 2001 by the National Commissioner of Police.
The purpose of the committee was to "inquire into the ongoing spate of attacks on farms, which include violent criminal acts against white people such as murder, robbery, rape, to determine the motives and factors behind these attacks and to make recommendations on their findings".
Nelson Mandela:
He was a committed member of the South African Communist Party.
Marxist revolutionary politics were at its core.
He was a leader of the revolutionary African National Congress, which he helped to radicalize into an organization sworn to armed, violent attacks against Apartheid.
The new anti-white government has committed atrocities against white people.
He was the leader of a violent, Communist revolution that has nearly succeeded in all of its grisly terrorism.
Kidnap murders, home invasions, gang rapes. ‘It’s heinous torture,’ Hruska explained. ‘Even children as young as 2 months old get burned with hot water, get wrapped in newspaper and burned.’
“In the case of one family, Hruska described a black mob breaking into a home, waiting for the white family to get home, then raping the mother in front of the father and son to see.
Then, after killing the mother, they killed the father and son by plunging them into boiling water. She said: ‘There is no easy way of saying exactly how these people are tortured. The standard would be a hot iron, electric iron, boiling water … and these are carried out for hours’.”
Yet many want to argue that Mandela changed his policies and later eschewed violence. Well, yes and no. While he worked for reconciliation, he continued to hobnob with and praise most of the world’s bloodiest dictators and terrorist leaders. As another commentator writes:
“After apartheid ended and Mandela was freed he wasted no time in lavishing praise on communists and thug dictators. In 1991 he and his wife Winnie went to Cuba, which they called their second home, to celebrate the communist revolution with Fidel Castro.
“While there he said, ‘Long live the Cuban Revolution. Long live comrade Fidel Castro… Cuban internationalists have done so much for African independence, freedom, and justice. We admire the sacrifices of the Cuban people in maintaining their independence and sovereignty in the face of a vicious imperialist campaign designed to destroy the advances of the Cuban revolution. We too want to control our destiny… There can be no surrender. It is a case of freedom or death. The Cuban revolution has been a source of inspiration to all freedom-loving people.’
Mandela also said of Cuba, ‘There’s one thing where that country stands out head and shoulders above the rest. That is its love for human rights and liberty.’ Of Libya’s dictator, Moammar Qaddafi, Mandela said he admired his commitment to fight for peace and human rights in the world.
“And in a speech given in Harlem, he referred to four Puerto Rican terrorists who shot and wounded five Congressmen and said, ‘We support the cause of anyone who is fighting for self-determination, and our attitude is the same, no matter who it is. I would be honored to sit on the platform with the four comrades you refer to’.”
And as I wrote in my earlier article, are things that much better in South Africa today? Many don’t think so: “Under ANC rule, South Africa has severely deteriorated. According to the Centre for Research on Globalization, most black South Africans are worse off now than they were under apartheid. Hundreds of thousands of jobs have vanished, costs for electricity, water, food and rent have skyrocketed, unemployment hovers around 40% and South Africa has become the violent crime and rape capital of the world.”
Or as Daniel Greenfield writes: “In the new apartheid, the black government represses a white minority and abuses its power over the black majority in ways that Western liberals would never tolerate if it were being practiced by men with Dutch last names. Every government crime is covered up by more incitement against the white minority with each generation of activists struggling to outdo the previous generation in its anti-white racism.
“For Western liberals, Mandela’s death provides them with permission to stop caring about South Africa. Having reduced South Africa to Mandela, his death permanently removes its existence from their minds. They may show up to the theater if Denzel Washington or Jamie Foxx decide to play Nelson Mandela. Otherwise they will comfortably banish the entire country to the dusty attic of forgotten history. Meanwhile one child is raped every three minutes and three children are murdered every day.”
“According to the Medical Research Council’s (MRC), up to 3600 women could be raped in the country every day. While women’s groups in South Africa estimate that a woman is raped every 26 seconds, the South African police estimate that a woman is raped every 36 seconds.”
As Gregory Hood puts it, “Mandela deserves full responsibility for all of this. From the beginning, his dream was of a unitary South African state dominated by black voters supporting a leftist political party, with a thin crust of whites to fund it and keep it going. South Africa’s decline into criminality and chaos is simply these ideas playing out to their logical conclusion.”06/03/2025 5:12 pm
Search analysis, research, academics…
Home
Edition
Europe
The Conversation
Newsletters
Donald Trump standing and pointing
Alex Brandon/AP
Trump wants the US to ‘take over’ Gaza and relocate the people. Is this legal?
Published: February 5, 2025 7.51am CET
Tamer Morris, University of Sydney
https://theconversation.com/trump-wants-the-us-to-take-over-gaza-and-relocate-the-people-is-this-legal-249143
Link copied
Share article
In an astonishing news conference in Washington, US President Donald Trump proposed the United States “take over” the Gaza Strip and permanently relocate the nearly two million Palestinians living there to neighbouring countries.
Trump has previously called on Egypt and Jordan to resettle Palestinians from Gaza, which both countries firmly rejected.
His new comments – and the possibility of a US takeover of a sovereign territory – were immediately met with criticism and questions about the legality of such a move.
When asked what authority would allow the US to do this, Trump did not have an answer. He only noted it would be a “long-term ownership position”. He also did not rule out using US troops.
So, what does international law say about this idea?
Can the US take over a sovereign territory?
The quick answer is no – Trump can’t just take over someone else’s territory.
Since the end of the second world war in 1945, the use of force has been prohibited in international law. This is one of the foundations of international law since the creation of the United Nations.
The US could only take control of Gaza with the consent of the sovereign authority of the territory. Israel can’t cede Gaza to the US. The International Court of Justice has ruled that Gaza is an occupied territory – and that this occupation is illegal under international law.
So, for this to happen legally, Trump would require the consent of Palestine and the Palestinian people to take control of Gaza.
Palestinians have begun making their way through the rubble to their homes in Gaza following the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Mohammed Saber/EPA
And what about removing a population?
One of the biggest obligations of an occupying power comes under Article 49 of the Geneva Conventions. This prohibits an occupying power from forcibly transferring or removing people from a territory.
All other states also have an obligation not to assist an occupying power in violating international humanitarian law. So that means if the US wanted to move the population of Gaza by force, Israel could not assist in this action. And likewise, the US cannot assist Israel in violating the rules.
Occupying powers are allowed to remove a population for the reason of safety.
Trump and his Middle East envoy who visited Gaza last week have repeatedly referenced how dangerous it is. Trump questioned how people could “want to stay” there, saying they have “no alternative” but to leave.
However, removing people for this reason has to only be temporary. Once it’s fine for someone to return, they must be returned.
What if people voluntarily leave?
Transferring a population has to be consensual. But in this specific case, it would mean the consent of all Palestinians in Gaza. The US could not force anyone to move who does not want to.
Further to this, a government, such as the Palestinian Authority, cannot give this consent on behalf of a people. People have a right to self-determination – the right to determine their own future.
A perfect example is migration – if a person migrates from one state to another, that is their right. It’s not displacement. But forcefully displacing them is not permitted.
And using what sounds like a threat would arguably not be consensual, either. This could be saying, for instance, “If you stay, you’ll die because there’s only going to be more war. But if you leave, there’s peace.” This is the threat of force.
Would forcing people to leave be ethnic cleansing?
Ethnic cleansing has not been defined in any treaty or convention.
However, most international law experts rely on the definition in the Commission of Experts report on the former state of Yugoslavia to the UN Security Council in 1994. It defined ethnic cleansing as:
rendering an area ethnically homogeneous by using force or intimidation to remove persons of given groups from the area.
So, under that definition, what is being suggested by Trump could be classified as ethnic cleansing – removing the Palestinian people from a certain geographical area through force or intimidation.
Displaced Palestinians arrive in Gaza City from their camps in the southern part of the enclave. Mohammed Saber/EPA
What can be done if Trump follows through?
If Trump follows through with this plan, it would be a violation of what is known as jus cogens, or the paramount, foundational rules that underpin international law.
And international law dictates that no country is allowed to cooperate with another in violating these rules and all countries must try to stop or prevent any potential violations. This could include placing sanctions on a country or not providing support to that country, for example, by selling it weapons.
A perfect example of this is when Russia illegally annexed Crimea in 2014, very few countries recognised the move. Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was then followed by sanctions and the freezing of Russian assets, among other actions.
If Trump pursued this course of action, he too could be personally liable under international criminal law if he’s the one instigating the forcible transfer of a population.
The International Criminal Court has already issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli defence minister and a Hamas commander in relation to the conflict.
The risk of this kind of language
One of the dangers of this kind of rhetoric is the potential to dehumanise the enemy, or the other side.
Trump does this through statements such as, “You look over the decades, it’s all death in Gaza”, and resettling people in “nice homes where they can be happy” instead of being “knifed to death”. This language implies the situation in Gaza is due to the “uncivilised” nature of the population.
The risk at the moment, even if Trump doesn’t do what he says, is that the mere vocalisation of his proposal is dehumanising to the Palestinian people. And this, in turn, could lead to more violations of the rules of war and international humanitarian law.
The nonchalant way Trump is discussing things such as taking over a territory and moving a population gives the impression these rules can easily be broken, even if he doesn’t break them himself.
Israel
International law
Gaza
Donald Trump
Ethnic cleansing
Palestinians
World news
Events
More events
Jobs
Associate Dean, Indigenous
Vice Chancellor’s Professorial Research and Impact Fellow
Subject Coordinator, Arts & Cultural Management
Lecturer, Exercise and Sport Science
Laboratory Head (multiple positions)
More jobs
Editorial Policies
Community standards
Republishing guidelines
Analytics
Our feeds
Get newsletter
Who we are
Our charter
Partners and funders
Resource for media
Contact us
Consent preferences
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions
Corrections
Copyright © 2010–2025, The Conversation Media Group Ltd